December 14, 2019
  • 2:34 pm Committee Leadership Comes into Focus for 116th Congress
  • 2:22 pm Interstate System Report Calls for More Funding, Tolling, VMT Fees, and Cybersecurity
  • 2:15 pm In Memoriam: President George H. W. Bush, ISTEA, and Transportation
  • 1:56 pm Growth Projected for Transportation Projects, but Costs a Challenge
  • 1:35 pm FAA Reshuffles Executives, Plans Drone Identification Rulemaking in Spring 2019
  • 1:28 pm Predictive Technology Helps Reduce Crashes on I-15 Corridor in Las Vegas
  • 1:14 pm Video Report: MoDOT Produces Multi-Lingual Safety Message
  • 1:11 pm PennDOT Nears Completion of Rapid Bridge Replacement Project
  • 1:08 pm Infrastructure Grants Awarded to “Smaller” South Dakota Communities
  • 10:36 am FCC Votes to Move Forward with 5.9 GHz Reallocation Proposal
  • 10:35 am ‘Smart City’ Event Examines Data’s Role in Transportation
  • 10:32 am USDOT to Provide TIFIA Loan for Interstate 64 Projects
  • 10:28 am Fitch Ratings Predicts Slowdown in Transportation Bonding
  • 10:22 am GHSA Report Puts Focus on High-Risk Impaired Drivers

The results of a recent survey conducted by AAA discerned that there is a “gap” in “consumer understanding” of partially automated driving systems based on the names given to the technology.

[Above photo via AAA.]

The group found that 40 percent of the 1,003 adult U.S. drivers it polled expect partially automated driving systems – with names like Autopilot, ProPILOT or Pilot Assist – to have the ability to drive the car by itself, whereas AAA testing indicates such systems are not designed to take over the task of driving and can be significantly challenged by every day, real-world conditions such as poor lane markings, unusual traffic patterns, and stationary vehicles.

“With today’s exciting advances in vehicle technology, there is a greater need for naming that clearly signals to a driver what the system does,” noted Greg Brannon, AAA’s director of automotive engineering and industry relations, in a statement. “Vague or confusing terminology may lead someone to overestimate a system’s capability, unintentionally placing the driver and others on the road at risk.”

Photo by Tesla

In partnership with the Automobile Club of Southern California’s Automotive Research Center, AAA said it tested four vehicles equipped with such technologies – a 2018 Mercedes-Benz S-Class, 2018 Nissan Rogue, 2017 Tesla Model S (seen at right) and 2019 Volvo XC40 – in both closed-course and on-road environments and found there were “a number of instances” that caused those partially autonomous systems to act in an “unpredictable manner” that “could take those drivers by surprise” who are too reliant on them.

“Both real-world and closed-course testing exposed separate yet equally serious limitations with these systems,” added Brannon. “It reinforces that there is still much work to be done to educate consumers on the nuances between system names and functionality and that it is much too early to refer to these vehicle technologies as automated.”

%d bloggers like this: