March 19, 2019
  • 2:34 pm Committee Leadership Comes into Focus for 116th Congress
  • 2:22 pm Interstate System Report Calls for More Funding, Tolling, VMT Fees, and Cybersecurity
  • 2:15 pm In Memoriam: President George H. W. Bush, ISTEA, and Transportation
  • 1:56 pm Growth Projected for Transportation Projects, but Costs a Challenge
  • 1:35 pm FAA Reshuffles Executives, Plans Drone Identification Rulemaking in Spring 2019
  • 1:28 pm Predictive Technology Helps Reduce Crashes on I-15 Corridor in Las Vegas
  • 1:14 pm Video Report: MoDOT Produces Multi-Lingual Safety Message
  • 1:11 pm PennDOT Nears Completion of Rapid Bridge Replacement Project
  • 1:08 pm Infrastructure Grants Awarded to “Smaller” South Dakota Communities
  • 2:08 pm State DOTs Urge Retention of Formula Funding, Grant Programs at Subcommittee Hearing
  • 2:05 pm President Trump’s FY 2020 Budget Envisions Changes to Transportation Funding
  • 1:57 pm State DOTs Seek to Boost Active Transportation Safety Efforts
  • 1:54 pm USDOT Secretary Chao: Transportation Future Must Focus on Safety, Innovation
  • 1:49 pm State Governments Issuing Legislation Aimed at Increasing Transportation Investments

The U.S. Government Accounting Office recommended in a March 11 report that the U.S. Department of Transportation take steps to “reform” its Build America Bureau organizational structure, as it “lacks a plan” to guide its ongoing and future efforts.

[Above photo of GAO headquarters.]

The Bureau – established in 2016 – evaluates applications for three financing programs: Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loans, Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing loans, and Private Activity Bonds.

While the GAO report said the Bureau “quickly addresses issues to decide when to advance projects through the process,” it “lacks a plan to guide ongoing and future efforts” as well as “performance indicators” to assess its progress.

“Without these tools, the Bureau may face difficulties prioritizing work to carry out other responsibilities and maintaining momentum throughout continued implementation efforts and any future changes in leadership and staff,” the GAO noted.

Photo by USDOT

On top of that, while the Bureau has taken steps to improve and streamline the application evaluation process, it does not have a mechanism to assess how well the process works – including what does and does not work well. TIFIA and RRIF loan recipients GAO said it interviewed provided “mixed reviews” on the Bureau’s application evaluation process, including the length of the process and changes to requirements or terms for a loan.

For example, GAO said loan recipients noted the Bureau took “longer than it had estimated” to procure external advisors to help conduct its evaluation of applications, with such “delays and uncertainty” leading to cost increases for two projects and construction delays for one project.

GAO added that while the Bureau provided a “clear rationale” for decisions to advance or approve projects in the TIFIA and RRIF programs, it did not do so for the PAB program.

editor@aashto.org

RELATED ARTICLES
%d bloggers like this: