December 10, 2019
  • 2:34 pm Committee Leadership Comes into Focus for 116th Congress
  • 2:22 pm Interstate System Report Calls for More Funding, Tolling, VMT Fees, and Cybersecurity
  • 2:15 pm In Memoriam: President George H. W. Bush, ISTEA, and Transportation
  • 1:56 pm Growth Projected for Transportation Projects, but Costs a Challenge
  • 1:35 pm FAA Reshuffles Executives, Plans Drone Identification Rulemaking in Spring 2019
  • 1:28 pm Predictive Technology Helps Reduce Crashes on I-15 Corridor in Las Vegas
  • 1:14 pm Video Report: MoDOT Produces Multi-Lingual Safety Message
  • 1:11 pm PennDOT Nears Completion of Rapid Bridge Replacement Project
  • 1:08 pm Infrastructure Grants Awarded to “Smaller” South Dakota Communities
  • 1:00 pm AASHTO Highlights Safety, Formula Funding at Freight System Hearing
  • 12:53 pm FCC’s 5.9 GHz Reallocation Plan Debated at House Hearing
  • 12:46 pm Lack of Reauthorization Could Imperil Future Transportation Infrastructure Spending
  • 12:42 pm USDOT Releases ‘Rule for Rules,’ Codifying Reforms
  • 12:39 pm FTA Awards $423M in Transit Infrastructure Grants

The impact of autonomous vehicles on public policy is “not getting the attention it needs,” argued Jim Tymon, executive director of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, during an April 2 roundtable co-hosted with the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators ahead of the annual Washington Auto Show in Washington, D.C.

Jim Tymon

“How autonomous vehicles are changing the nature of motor vehicles and how public policy must adapt to those new technologies are issues we will be dealing with now and in the future,” he explained. “As a result we need to explore what opportunities may exist for cross-sector [policy] collaboration across jurisdictions.”

Over 40 representatives from local, state, and federal government agencies, along with industry associations and private companies, attended the roundtable and provided their insights on how to build a broad “regulatory framework” in the U.S. to support autonomous vehicle innovation while ensuring safe testing and deployment practices.

AASHTO’s King Gee (at right in photo) with AAMVA’s Ian Grossman

“There is a legitimate debate between the need for introducing new technology balanced against the need to test and regulate this technology,” noted King Gee, AASHTO’s engineering director. “Safe deployment of autonomous vehicles is what we all want.”

Bernard Soriano, deputy director of the California Department of Motor Vehicles, noted for example that his state has had regulations in place for autonomous vehicle testing on public roads since 2014.

Since that time, he said his agency has issued 66 permits to 62 companies actively testing autonomous vehicle technology: from manufacturers and Tier 1 suppliers down to “small startup companies” making components that eventually will be incorporated into autonomous vehicle systems.

Bernard Soriano

Soriano – who serves as the chair for AAMVA’s autonomous vehicle work group – also pointed out that there have been 134 crashes involving autonomous test vehicles over the nearly five-year span since California DMV has been issuing testing permits, “most of them minor, with them typically getting hit from behind by conventionally-driven vehicles,” he said.

“As a result of this, the issue we need to take on is the public education need around this technology and, more importantly, explaining the limitations of this technology,” he stressed. “We [AAMVA] published a set of best practices in May of 2018 to guide states in administering the operation of autonomous vehicles and are now working on a second set.”

Jeff Beck

Yet Jeff Beck, manager of federal affairs for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, emphasized that regulation is something of a double-edged sword when it comes to the development needs of autonomous vehicle technology.

“Automakers need clarity more than anything else when it comes to the regulations governing autonomous vehicle technology, and more importantly, to get those rules right,” he said. “But it typically takes eight to 10 years to complete rulemaking at the federal level – and that means, in the interim, the U.S. could lose its lead in innovation.”

Beck explained that, much like human drivers, autonomous vehicles learn best in “real world” situations.

“While track testing is valuable, there are many limitations from close course operation and computer simulations. We cannot replicate the incredibly diverse set of conditions on rural and urban roadways, with fast, slow, and distracted human drivers,” he said. “The only way machine learning can understand that complexity is to operate on real roads. Also, without the data gathered from real-world testing, the rulemaking process can become more difficult.”

 

editor@aashto.org

RELATED ARTICLES
%d bloggers like this: