November 20, 2019
  • 2:34 pm Committee Leadership Comes into Focus for 116th Congress
  • 2:22 pm Interstate System Report Calls for More Funding, Tolling, VMT Fees, and Cybersecurity
  • 2:15 pm In Memoriam: President George H. W. Bush, ISTEA, and Transportation
  • 1:56 pm Growth Projected for Transportation Projects, but Costs a Challenge
  • 1:35 pm FAA Reshuffles Executives, Plans Drone Identification Rulemaking in Spring 2019
  • 1:28 pm Predictive Technology Helps Reduce Crashes on I-15 Corridor in Las Vegas
  • 1:14 pm Video Report: MoDOT Produces Multi-Lingual Safety Message
  • 1:11 pm PennDOT Nears Completion of Rapid Bridge Replacement Project
  • 1:08 pm Infrastructure Grants Awarded to “Smaller” South Dakota Communities
  • 12:42 pm State DOTs Reiterate Benefits of TIM Training at Safety Summit
  • 12:37 pm AASHTO Issues Second Coalition Rescission Repeal Letter
  • 12:36 pm Tariff Report Highlights Raw Material Cost Concerns
  • 12:23 pm USDOT Releases $900M in BUILD Grants
  • 12:19 pm House T&I Amtrak Hearing Airs State-Level Rail Concerns

The initial state-by-state calculation of the impending $7.6 billion rescission of Federal-aid highway contract authority mandated by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation or FAST Act indicates states may experience deeper funding cuts than what was called for in that 2015 law.

According to Federal Highway Administration data released this week, the total unobligated balances of state highway funding subject to the rescission – scheduled to occur July 1, 2020 – stands at just over $5.35 billion as of September 30. That means a further $2 billion-plus will be extracted from federal-aid highway contract authority held by states during fiscal year 2020.

Texas provides one of several stark examples of this funding cut. According to FHWA data, Texas has an unobligated balance of $679.4 million as of September 30. Yet since its share of the $7.6 billion rescission – based on formula funding calculations – is 12.69 percent, Texas will have to return more than $960 million to federal coffers, impacting funding streams for transportation projects already on the books.

Jim Tymon. Photo by Cathy Morrison/MoDOT

“In short, this is rescinding more federal-aid highway contract authority than states have,” warned Jim Tymon, executive director of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. “Once these dollars go away, they will not otherwise be invested in our nation’s transportation system.”

AASHTO added in a separate letter to Senate leaders on October 30 that “it is especially critical to repeal this [rescission] in calendar year 2019 because, in the worst-case scenario, states may be forced to deobligate existing projects in order to provide the necessary amount of contract authority to be rescinded.”

The organization further noted that “the lack of funding flexibility resulting from the rescission will severely undermine states’ asset management processes which are intended to meet key national performance targets on safety, pavement, bridge, freight movement, congestion, emission, and overall system performance.”

Photo by Arizona DOT

A group of 41 transportation organizations led by AASHTO called for the repeal of the rescission in a September 12 letter to Congressional leadership, noting that it will “significantly depress the 10-year budget baseline for surface transportation programs beginning in Fiscal Year 2021, undermining significant bipartisan support in Congress and the Administration for boosting federal infrastructure investment.”

Repealing the rescission also has strong bipartisan and bicameral support in Congress. The leaders of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works introduced S.1992 to repeal the FAST Act rescission, which to date has garnered 23 co-sponsors.

Earlier in the year they called for the repeal of the rescission in a letter on June 12, which echoed a similar appeal made by the leadership for the House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure in a May 8 letter.

“This rescission should be repealed in any future budget or spending agreement that the Congress considers before the end of this fiscal year,” noted Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., chairman of the EPW committee, and Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., ranking member, in their joint letter to Senate leadership.

“If it stands, this rescission will impact every state’s ability to plan, build and repair needed roads and bridges that are vital to American communities,” they said. “Failure to address this rescission will cost jobs and needlessly slow our economy.”

 

editor@aashto.org

RELATED ARTICLES
%d bloggers like this: