December 10, 2019
  • 2:34 pm Committee Leadership Comes into Focus for 116th Congress
  • 2:22 pm Interstate System Report Calls for More Funding, Tolling, VMT Fees, and Cybersecurity
  • 2:15 pm In Memoriam: President George H. W. Bush, ISTEA, and Transportation
  • 1:56 pm Growth Projected for Transportation Projects, but Costs a Challenge
  • 1:35 pm FAA Reshuffles Executives, Plans Drone Identification Rulemaking in Spring 2019
  • 1:28 pm Predictive Technology Helps Reduce Crashes on I-15 Corridor in Las Vegas
  • 1:14 pm Video Report: MoDOT Produces Multi-Lingual Safety Message
  • 1:11 pm PennDOT Nears Completion of Rapid Bridge Replacement Project
  • 1:08 pm Infrastructure Grants Awarded to “Smaller” South Dakota Communities
  • 1:00 pm AASHTO Highlights Safety, Formula Funding at Freight System Hearing
  • 12:53 pm FCC’s 5.9 GHz Reallocation Plan Debated at House Hearing
  • 12:46 pm Lack of Reauthorization Could Imperil Future Transportation Infrastructure Spending
  • 12:42 pm USDOT Releases ‘Rule for Rules,’ Codifying Reforms
  • 12:39 pm FTA Awards $423M in Transit Infrastructure Grants

A one-month continuing resolution or CR that extends federal government funding through December 20 also contained a provision that repealed a $7.6 billion rescission of federal-aid highway contract authority – a cut originally mandated by the 2015 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation or FAST Act to occur next year.

The House of Representatives passed the CR by a vote of 231 to 192 on November 18, followed on November 21 by passage in the Senate by a vote of 74 to 20 on and President Trump’s signature on the measure, just hours before a previous CR signed in September expired.

Photo by WVDOT

“Repealing the highway rescission today was an absolute must,” noted Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W. Va., chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works subcommittee on transportation and infrastructure, in a statement.

“Failure to do so would have resulted in clawing back millions of dollars that states have already contracted out for highway infrastructure projects,” Sen. Capito added. “This entire ordeal is a good lesson, though: Congress must do its job and fully fund programs like this to prevent more budget brinksmanship in the future.”

In the first segment of a new video series on Transportation TV entitled “On Time with Tymon,” Jim Tymon, executive director of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, expressed his gratitude to Congress and the President for their bipartisan support in eliminating the $7.6 billion rescission

Concerns regarding the impact of the rescission were heightened when the Federal Highway Administration released data in early November that estimated the total unobligated balances of state highway funding subject to the rescission stood at just over $5.35 billion; meaning that a further $2 billion-plus would have been extracted from federal-aid highway contract authority held by states during fiscal year 2020.

Photo by Arizona DOT

To head off that drastic situation, AASHTO led a 42-organization effort to repeal the rescission, authoring two letters to Congressional leadership in the Senate and the House – one in September and one in November – outlining the negative impact the rescission would have had on transportation project timelines.

“It is especially critical to repeal this [rescission] in calendar year 2019 because, in the worst-case scenario, states may be forced to deobligate existing projects in order to provide the necessary amount of contract authority to be rescinded,” AASHTO added in a separate letter to Senate leaders on October 30.

However, with the rescission now repealed, state departments of transportation and their partners “will now have greater certainty in delivering critical highway and transportation improvements in every part of the country,” explained AASHTO’s Tymon in a November 21 letter.

“Furthermore, by restoring federal highway funding flexibility through this repeal, states can optimize their asset management efforts which are intended to meet key national performance targets on safety, pavement, bridge, freight movement, congestion, emissions, and overall system performance,” he said.

 

editor@aashto.org

RELATED ARTICLES
%d bloggers like this: