September 25, 2020
  • 12:12 pm House’s Continuing Resolution Would Extend FAST Act
  • 12:11 pm The Transportation Law Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
  • 12:05 pm ASCE: Nation’s Surface Transportation Faces $5T Investment Gap
  • 11:56 am House Hearing Examines Reauthorization of USDOT’s DBE Program
  • 11:47 am FHWA Supporting Seven Innovations Via EDC Program
 

On June 22 the House of Representatives released the text of the Moving Forward Act that seeks to make $1.5 trillion worth of infrastructure investments across a number of U.S. economic sectors, such as transportation, energy, education, housing, and healthcare, among others.

Image via the KYTC

That legislation includes within it the INVEST in America Act surface transportation reauthorization bill recently advanced by the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee on June 18.

A 96-page summary of the Moving Forward Act breaks down the specific sector-by-sector infrastructure investments, including:

  • $494 billion in surface transportation reauthorization funding.
  • $130 billion via the Reopen and Rebuild America’s Schools Act, targeting “high-poverty” school infrastructure needs.
  • $100 billion for “affordable housing infrastructure” to create or preserve 1.8 million homes.
  • $30 billion to upgrade hospitals to increase capacity, help community health centers respond to COVID-19, and prepare for future public health emergencies.
  • $25 billion in the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and other programs to ensure access clean drinking water and to help remove dangerous contaminants from local water systems.
  • $25 billion to modernize U.S. Post Office infrastructure and operations, including building up a “zero emissions” postal vehicle fleet plus buying modern mail processing equipment and other goods.

The House Democratic originally mapped out some of those infrastructure investment priorities in January; aiming to bring existing infrastructure across the United States into a “state of good repair,” enabling the completion of critical projects, and making combating climate change a central tenet of any infrastructure investment efforts.

Photo by the Mississippi DOT

Yet, while some transportation industry groups support the proposed levels of infrastructure funding within the bill, the one-sided legislative process is threatening to roll back years of bipartisan policy progress.

“With historic unemployment, tremendous unmet infrastructure needs, and less than four months before the expiration of surface transportation programs, this is no time for another partisan approach to infrastructure,” noted Neil Bradley, executive vice president and chief policy officer for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in a statement.

“The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee produced a bipartisan bill that drew unanimous support,” he added. “We stand ready to work with Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate to move a bipartisan bill the president can sign into law that would revive our nation’s infrastructure.”

Jim Tymon, executive director of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, also expressed disappointment that both the surface transportation reauthorization bill and larger infrastructure package lack bipartisan support.

“While we appreciate the House T&I Committee and the House leadership for recognizing the need to reauthorize the surface transportation programs before the end of this fiscal year through floor consideration of the Move Forward Act, the proposed reauthorization contained in the INVEST in America Act unnecessarily turns back the clock on the bipartisan reforms previously agreed to by Congress,” he said.

While Tymon noted that fiscal relief within the legislation for state DOTs facing challenging financial situation due to COVID-19 is welcome, in many cases, the bill also creates or increases administrative burdens for states.

He also pointed out that the Surface Transportation Advanced through Reform, Technology, & Efficient Review or STARTER Act introduced by the House T&I committee’s Republican Minority on June 17 “focuses on formula funding programs, streamlining project delivery and ensuring state flexibility – all principles adopted by the AASHTO Board of Directors.”

“Unfortunately, these critical principles are absent in the Move Forward Act,” Tymon said. “We urge both sides of the political aisle to work together to get this much-needed surface transportation bill over the finish line [and] find bipartisan consensus on diverse issues such as maintaining the flexibility and maximizing the funding of current core formula programs, addressing climate change and resiliency, improving project delivery, focusing on bridge investments, and meeting the infrastructure needs of rural and urban areas.”

editor@aashto.org

RELATED ARTICLES
%d bloggers like this: