March 7, 2021
  • 1:05 pm ASCE Report: U.S. Transportation Infrastructure Needs Investment
  • 12:59 pm Drop in VMT Coincides with Spike in Motor Vehicle Fatalities, Injuries
  • 12:56 pm House T&I Plans to Add Earmarks in Surface Reauthorization Legislation
  • 12:52 pm FAF Five-Year Benchmark Shows Spike in Freight Transportation
  • 12:49 pm Leveraging Policy, Funding to Improve Infrastructure Resiliency

A new report authored by the American Association of Retired Persons’ Public Policy Institute, Urbanism Next Center, University of Oregon, and RAND Corporation finds that a “large population of harder-to-serve older adults” are being “left out” of the “new mobility revolution” that encompasses ride-sharing and autonomous vehicles or AVs.

[Above photo via the National Aging and Disability Transportation Center.]

That report – sponsored by AARP – finds that older adults who have more limitations (physical, cognitive, multiple disabilities, financial, technology access/understanding) or certain specific needs (transportation that accommodates mobility aids, low-income, rural location) often do not fit into current “new mobility” business models.

Photo via the National Aging and Disability Transportation Center

The report said the current “ride-hailing service model” provides a useful analytic proxy for AVs, as it presents a similar consumer experience to what is expected for AVs. It then outlines three major barriers for older adults with limitations or specific needs:

  • Using these emerging transportation technologies requires smartphone and internet access, and access to making online payments, all of which present challenges for many older adults who may lack even a base level of tech fluency and comfort.
  • The vehicles can be difficult to enter and exit, and they may not easily accommodate the walking aids or wheelchairs that are used by approximately a quarter of all older adults.
  • Current ride hailing and projected AV services focus almost exclusively on curb-to-curb service, but many older adults need door-to-door or hand-to-hand service due to other challenges. Those include identifying the vehicle when it arrives; stowing and retrieving bags or mobility aids; finding the correct door at complex locations such as a hospitals or shopping centers; and physically navigating busy streets and sidewalks.

“Eliminating this ‘nobody’s problem’ challenge will require public and private sector focus, funding, and coordination between traditional paratransit providers – local governments, social service organization – and micro-transit operators, existing new mobility providers, and AV companies,” the report concluded.

“The framework in this report can provide an easy-to-consult reference for policymakers as they define roles and responsibilities among public- and private-sector actors whose actions can enable equitable access – or result in greater inequity,” it said.

editor@aashto.org

RELATED ARTICLES
%d bloggers like this: